Saturday, December 14, 2013
Tuesday, October 08, 2013
2013 Nobel Prize in Physics
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for 2013 to
François Englert Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium, and
Peter W. Higgs University of Edinburgh, UK
“for the theoretical discovery of a mechanism that contributes to our understanding of the origin of mass of subatomic particles, and which recently was confirmed through the discovery of the predicted fundamental particle, by the ATLAS and CMS experiments at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider.”
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2013/press.html
François Englert Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium, and
Peter W. Higgs University of Edinburgh, UK
“for the theoretical discovery of a mechanism that contributes to our understanding of the origin of mass of subatomic particles, and which recently was confirmed through the discovery of the predicted fundamental particle, by the ATLAS and CMS experiments at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider.”
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2013/press.html
Friday, December 28, 2012
Ramanujan Proved Right After 90 Years
Ramanujan believed that 17 new functions he discovered were "mock modular forms" that looked like theta functions when written out as an infinte sum (their coefficients get large in the same way), but weren't super-symmetric. [...] Emory University mathematician Ken Ono and his team recently proved that these functions indeed mimicked modular forms, but don't share their defining characteristics, such as super-symmetry.
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2012/12/28/mathematician-century-old-secrets-unlocked/
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2012/12/28/mathematician-century-old-secrets-unlocked/
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
2012 Nobel Prize in Physics
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2012 was awarded jointly to Serge Haroche and David J. Wineland "for ground-breaking experimental methods that enable measuring and manipulation of individual quantum systems"
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2012/
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Voyager at Edge of Solar System
Voyager 1 has entered a region of space with a markedly higher flow of charged particles from beyond our solar system. Mission scientists suspect this increased flow indicates that the spacecraft — currently 11.1 billion miles from Earth — may be poised to cross the boundary into interstellar space.
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/06/18/nasa-voyager-1-spacecraft-nears-interstellar-space/
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/06/18/nasa-voyager-1-spacecraft-nears-interstellar-space/
Sunday, January 08, 2012
A First Course in Loop Quantum Gravity
Same idea as Zwiebach's A First Course in String Theory. I highly recommend both books, whichever side of the intellectual divide you're on, or even if (particularly if?) you are agnostic on the question of the correct way to quantize gravity.
Saturday, December 31, 2011
Graduate Physics Education ... Free!
Perimeter Scholars International
The 2011-2012 PSI course series is a condensed program of first and second year graduate physics study including quantum field theory and conformal field theory, quantum information, general relativity, cosmology, the standard model and particle theory, mathematical physics, statistical mechanics and condensed matter physics, string theory, and quantum gravity.
Perimeter Institute Recorded Seminar Archive
The PIRSA website contains the usual collection of advanced graduate courses (together with some unusual but noteworthy choices):
PIRSA:C11003 - Higher Spin Theories
PIRSA:C10018 - Space-time, Quantum Mechanics and Scattering Amplitudes
PIRSA:C10008 - Cosmology Mini Course
PIRSA:C10003 - Quantum Field Theory for Cosmology
PIRSA:C10002 - Foundations and Interpretation of Quantum Theory
PIRSA:C09056 - Quantum Spin Simulations
PIRSA:C09020 - Introduction to Effective Field Theory
PIRSA:C09019 - General Relativity for Cosmology
PIRSA:C08019 - Quantum Field Theory
PIRSA:C08018 - Astrophysics & Cosmology through Problems
PIRSA:C08002 - Advanced General Relativity
PIRSA:C08001 - New Horizons In Fundamental Physics
PIRSA:C07007 - Advanced Topics in Cosmology
PIRSA:C07002 - Introduction to Quantum Groups
PIRSA:C06014 - Introduction to Quantum Information and Computation
PIRSA:C06012 - The Standard Model and Quantum Field Theory
PIRSA:C06001 - Introduction to Quantum Gravity
PIRSA:C05001 - Interpretation of Quantum Theory
as well as a slew of specialized courses on narrower topics.
(This list has been updated to include all courses of interest through 12/31/2011.)
The 2011-2012 PSI course series is a condensed program of first and second year graduate physics study including quantum field theory and conformal field theory, quantum information, general relativity, cosmology, the standard model and particle theory, mathematical physics, statistical mechanics and condensed matter physics, string theory, and quantum gravity.
Perimeter Institute Recorded Seminar Archive
The PIRSA website contains the usual collection of advanced graduate courses (together with some unusual but noteworthy choices):
PIRSA:C11003 - Higher Spin Theories
PIRSA:C10018 - Space-time, Quantum Mechanics and Scattering Amplitudes
PIRSA:C10008 - Cosmology Mini Course
PIRSA:C10003 - Quantum Field Theory for Cosmology
PIRSA:C10002 - Foundations and Interpretation of Quantum Theory
PIRSA:C09056 - Quantum Spin Simulations
PIRSA:C09020 - Introduction to Effective Field Theory
PIRSA:C09019 - General Relativity for Cosmology
PIRSA:C08019 - Quantum Field Theory
PIRSA:C08018 - Astrophysics & Cosmology through Problems
PIRSA:C08002 - Advanced General Relativity
PIRSA:C08001 - New Horizons In Fundamental Physics
PIRSA:C07007 - Advanced Topics in Cosmology
PIRSA:C07002 - Introduction to Quantum Groups
PIRSA:C06014 - Introduction to Quantum Information and Computation
PIRSA:C06012 - The Standard Model and Quantum Field Theory
PIRSA:C06001 - Introduction to Quantum Gravity
PIRSA:C05001 - Interpretation of Quantum Theory
as well as a slew of specialized courses on narrower topics.
(This list has been updated to include all courses of interest through 12/31/2011.)
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Tuesday, October 04, 2011
2011 Nobel Prize in Physics
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2011 was divided, one half awarded to Saul Perlmutter, the other half jointly to Brian P. Schmidt and Adam G. Riess "for the discovery of the accelerating expansion of the Universe through observations of distant supernovae."
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2011/
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2011/
Friday, December 31, 2010
University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Math Video Archive
http://www.uccs.edu/~math/vidarchive.html
Spring Semester 2010
Math 448- Mathematical Modeling - Dr. Radu Cascaval
Spring Semester 2009
Math 443- Ordinary Differential Equations - Dr. Radu Cascaval
Fall Semester 2008
Math 447- Applied Mathematics - Dr. Radu Cascaval
Summer Semester 2008
Math 442 - Optimization - Dr. Radu Cascaval
Fall Semester 2007
Math 414 - Modern Algebra - Dr. Gene Abrams
Math 533 - Real Analysis - Dr. Rinaldo Schinazi
Summer Semester 2007
Math 425 - Chaotic Dynamical Systems - Dr. Greg Morrow
Spring Semester 2007
Math 432 - Modern Analysis II - Dr. Bob Carlson
Fall Semester 2006
Math 431 - Modern Analysis I - Dr. Rinaldo Schinazi
Summer Semester 2006
Math 483 - Linear Statistical Models - Dr. Greg Morrow
Spring Semester 2006
Math 535 - Applied Functional Analysis - Dr. Greg Morrow
Spring Semester 2010
Math 448- Mathematical Modeling - Dr. Radu Cascaval
Spring Semester 2009
Math 443- Ordinary Differential Equations - Dr. Radu Cascaval
Fall Semester 2008
Math 447- Applied Mathematics - Dr. Radu Cascaval
Summer Semester 2008
Math 442 - Optimization - Dr. Radu Cascaval
Fall Semester 2007
Math 414 - Modern Algebra - Dr. Gene Abrams
Math 533 - Real Analysis - Dr. Rinaldo Schinazi
Summer Semester 2007
Math 425 - Chaotic Dynamical Systems - Dr. Greg Morrow
Spring Semester 2007
Math 432 - Modern Analysis II - Dr. Bob Carlson
Fall Semester 2006
Math 431 - Modern Analysis I - Dr. Rinaldo Schinazi
Summer Semester 2006
Math 483 - Linear Statistical Models - Dr. Greg Morrow
Spring Semester 2006
Math 535 - Applied Functional Analysis - Dr. Greg Morrow
ICTP Diploma Programs in Math & Physics
High Energy Physics
Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
Quantum Electrodynamics
Quantum Field Theory
Lie Groups and Lie Algebras
Introduction to Particle Physics
General Relativity
The Standard Model
Susy Field Theory
String Theory
Condensed Matter Physics
Advanced Statistical Mechanics
Advanced Quantum Mechanics
Many Body Physics
Solid State Physics
Graduate Mathematics
Partial Differential Equations
Topology
Algebraic Topology
Abstract Algebra
Complex Analysis
Real Analysis I and Real Analysis II
Functional Analysis I and Functional Analysis II
Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Ergodic Theory
Differential Geometry
Algebraic Geometry
Probability Theory
Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
Quantum Electrodynamics
Quantum Field Theory
Lie Groups and Lie Algebras
Introduction to Particle Physics
General Relativity
The Standard Model
Susy Field Theory
String Theory
Condensed Matter Physics
Advanced Statistical Mechanics
Advanced Quantum Mechanics
Many Body Physics
Solid State Physics
Graduate Mathematics
Partial Differential Equations
Topology
Algebraic Topology
Abstract Algebra
Complex Analysis
Real Analysis I and Real Analysis II
Functional Analysis I and Functional Analysis II
Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Ergodic Theory
Differential Geometry
Algebraic Geometry
Probability Theory
Online Physics Video Courses
Everybody knows about MIT OCW and Stanford on iTunes, but here are a few less well known video lectures on advanced physics topics.
Classical Mechanics at McGill University
Computational Physics at Oregon State University
Foundations of Theoretical Physics at USC
General Relativity at McGill University
Quantum Physics A, B & C at UCSD
Mathematical Physics I & II at University of New Mexico
Quantum Mechanics I & II at University of New Mexico
Quantum Field Theory I & II at University of New Mexico
Classical Mechanics at McGill University
Computational Physics at Oregon State University
Foundations of Theoretical Physics at USC
General Relativity at McGill University
Quantum Physics A, B & C at UCSD
Mathematical Physics I & II at University of New Mexico
Quantum Mechanics I & II at University of New Mexico
Quantum Field Theory I & II at University of New Mexico
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Here's someone else who shouldn't be trying to do math
http://www.thebigquestions.com/2010/12/22/a-big-answer-2/
The correct answer is 1/2. In statistical notation, he is asking us to calculate E[G]/E[B+G], the expected proportion of females in the total population. However, he turns it into the different question E[G/(B+G)], the expected proportion of females in an average family, which is not generally equal to the first expression (since families are of different sizes) and which in this case gives the incorrect answer of 30.6%. The guy is impervious to all the good arguments that have been posted to his blog pointing out his error.
His argument is exactly the same as if I headed down to the roulette tables in Vegas and placed bets on black, just making sure that at each session I stop when black hits. According to his "math", that strategy should provide a 69.4% win rate (slightly less once we account for 0 and 00, but still well above 50%). A sure-fire way to beat the house!
The correct answer is 1/2. In statistical notation, he is asking us to calculate E[G]/E[B+G], the expected proportion of females in the total population. However, he turns it into the different question E[G/(B+G)], the expected proportion of females in an average family, which is not generally equal to the first expression (since families are of different sizes) and which in this case gives the incorrect answer of 30.6%. The guy is impervious to all the good arguments that have been posted to his blog pointing out his error.
His argument is exactly the same as if I headed down to the roulette tables in Vegas and placed bets on black, just making sure that at each session I stop when black hits. According to his "math", that strategy should provide a 69.4% win rate (slightly less once we account for 0 and 00, but still well above 50%). A sure-fire way to beat the house!
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
String Theory Tested, Fails Black Hole Predictions
Back in 2006 there was a lot of talk of testing String Theory. Well, today CERN released a statement for the Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. The short of it is simply that as far as they could tell, 'No experimental evidence for microscopic black holes has been found.' The long statement indicates that since the highly precise CMS detector found no spray of sub-atomic particles of normal matter while LHC smashed particles together, the hypothesis by string theory that micro black holes would be formed and quickly evaporated in this experiment was incorrect. These tests have given the team confidence to say that they can exclude a 'variety of theoretical models' for the cases of black holes with a mass of 3.5-4.5 TeV. While you may not be able to run around claiming that string theory is dead and disproved, evidently there are some adjustments that need to be made. (Source: Slashdot)
Saturday, October 09, 2010
2010 Nobel in Physics
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2010/
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2010 was awarded jointly to Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov "for groundbreaking experiments regarding the two-dimensional material graphene."
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2010 was awarded jointly to Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov "for groundbreaking experiments regarding the two-dimensional material graphene."
Thursday, September 30, 2010
World's Worst Physicist?
University of Central Florida physics professor Costas Efthimiou's work debunks pseudoscientific ideas, such as vampires and zombies, in an attempt to enhance public literacy. Legend has it that vampires feed on human blood and once bitten a person turns into a vampire and starts feasting on the blood of others. Efthimiou's debunking logic: On Jan 1, 1600, the human population was 536,870,911. If the first vampire came into existence that day and bit one person a month, there would have been two vampires by Feb. 1, 1600. A month later there would have been four, and so on. In just two-and-a-half years the original human population would all have become vampires with nobody left to feed on. If mortality rates were taken into consideration, the population would disappear much faster. Even an unrealistically high reproduction rate couldn't counteract this effect.
Wow! Leaving aside that his work debunking pseudoscience is NOT what we as a society expect our well-paid physicists to be working on, let's look at his own pseudoscientific work...
536,870,911 - really? and he knows this how? Has he ever heard of significant digits?
"once bitten a person turns into a vampire" - false; anybody with even a passing understanding of the vampire myth knows this to be wrong; dude needed to do some basic research
He's essentially assuming (a) vampires are immortal and (b) vampires must feed at least once a month on a human. These assumptions are mutually contradictory. If vampires were immortal then they would not have to feed every month to stay alive. If they must feed every month to stay alive then the well-known predator-prey model (based on the Lotka-Volterra differential equation) can predict all sorts of end-states, including extinction of humans, extinction of vampires, equilibrium, oscillation, or chaotic swings in the vampire and human populations, depending on the various parameters that can be used in the equations. Seriously, what on earth was this guy thinking when he tackled this problem? I wonder how long he worked on his "solution"? I've seen better thought-out logic on freshman physics papers.
Actually, on second thought, maybe it's better that this guy isn't doing physics. That could be dangerous!
Wow! Leaving aside that his work debunking pseudoscience is NOT what we as a society expect our well-paid physicists to be working on, let's look at his own pseudoscientific work...
536,870,911 - really? and he knows this how? Has he ever heard of significant digits?
"once bitten a person turns into a vampire" - false; anybody with even a passing understanding of the vampire myth knows this to be wrong; dude needed to do some basic research
He's essentially assuming (a) vampires are immortal and (b) vampires must feed at least once a month on a human. These assumptions are mutually contradictory. If vampires were immortal then they would not have to feed every month to stay alive. If they must feed every month to stay alive then the well-known predator-prey model (based on the Lotka-Volterra differential equation) can predict all sorts of end-states, including extinction of humans, extinction of vampires, equilibrium, oscillation, or chaotic swings in the vampire and human populations, depending on the various parameters that can be used in the equations. Seriously, what on earth was this guy thinking when he tackled this problem? I wonder how long he worked on his "solution"? I've seen better thought-out logic on freshman physics papers.
Actually, on second thought, maybe it's better that this guy isn't doing physics. That could be dangerous!
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Peer review
Breakthroughs from the second tier
Peer review isn't perfect - meet 5 high-impact papers that should have ended up in bigger journals.
by the Scientist staff
I hate your paper
Many say the peer review system is broken. Here's how some journals are trying to fix it.
by Jef Akst
Peer review and the age of aquarius
It's time to reinvent the system that validates scientific discovery.
by Sarah Greene
Peer pressure
What should we do with peer review? Tell us in our new poll.
by Richard Grant
Peer review isn't perfect - meet 5 high-impact papers that should have ended up in bigger journals.
by the Scientist staff
I hate your paper
Many say the peer review system is broken. Here's how some journals are trying to fix it.
by Jef Akst
Peer review and the age of aquarius
It's time to reinvent the system that validates scientific discovery.
by Sarah Greene
Peer pressure
What should we do with peer review? Tell us in our new poll.
by Richard Grant
Thursday, April 08, 2010
Tuesday, April 06, 2010
My nominee for the decade's worst scientific reporting
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/04/05/freaky-physics-proves-parallel-universes/?test=faces
2) The "time travel to the future and back again" idea is completely idiotic. I find it hard to believe that Richard Gott actually said that. My bet is the reporter got it wrong. (If not, then shame on Richard Gott.)
3) None of this has anything to do with the actual discovery, which is that researchers at UCSB appear to have found a macro-system that exhibits quantum superposition.
4) The headline is that this proves parallel universes exist. I'm still trying to figure out wtf that even means in the context of this story.
Wolf says that time - at least in quantum mechanics - doesn't move straight like an arrow. It zig-zags, and he thinks it may be possible to build a machine that lets you bend time. Consider Sergei Krikalev, the Russian astronaut who flew six space missions. Richard Gott, a physicist at Princeton University, says Krikalev aged 1/48th of a second less than the rest of us because he orbited at very high speeds. And to age less than someone means you've jumped into the future - you did not experience the same present. In a sense, he says, Krikalev time-traveled to the future - and back again!1) Writer switches from QM to relativity in a completely unwarranted manner.
2) The "time travel to the future and back again" idea is completely idiotic. I find it hard to believe that Richard Gott actually said that. My bet is the reporter got it wrong. (If not, then shame on Richard Gott.)
3) None of this has anything to do with the actual discovery, which is that researchers at UCSB appear to have found a macro-system that exhibits quantum superposition.
4) The headline is that this proves parallel universes exist. I'm still trying to figure out wtf that even means in the context of this story.
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Get your geek on!
For those (like myself) who wanted to play with Mathematica but couldn't justify the price ... there's now Mathematica Home Edition!!
http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathematicahomeedition/qa.html
(The functionality is exactly the same as in the full edition; it's just the licensing that is more restricted.)
http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathematicahomeedition/qa.html
(The functionality is exactly the same as in the full edition; it's just the licensing that is more restricted.)
Monday, January 04, 2010
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Undergraduate Physics Education ... Free!
iTunes U has a free downloadable course by Stanford's Leonard Susskind called The Theoretical Minimum. It consists of 57 video lectures covering almost an entire undergraduate physics education - Classical Mechanics, Quantum Mechanics, Statistical Mechanics, Special Relativity & Electromagnetism, General Relativity, even Cosmology.
Tuesday, October 06, 2009
2009 Nobel in Physics
This year's Nobel Prize in Physics is awarded for two scientific achievements that have helped to shape the foundations of today's networked societies. They have created many practical innovations for everyday life and provided new tools for scientific exploration.
In 1966, Charles K. Kao made a discovery that led to a breakthrough in fiber optics. He carefully calculated how to transmit light over long distances via optical glass fibers. With a fiber of purest glass it would be possible to transmit light signals over 100 kilometers, compared to only 20 meters for the fibers available in the 1960s.
In 1969 Willard S. Boyle and George E. Smith invented the first successful imaging technology using a digital sensor, a Charge-Coupled Device. Digital photography has become an irreplaceable tool in many fields of research. The CCD has provided new possibilities to visualize the previously unseen. It has given us crystal clear images of distant places in our universe as well as the depths of the oceans.
In 1966, Charles K. Kao made a discovery that led to a breakthrough in fiber optics. He carefully calculated how to transmit light over long distances via optical glass fibers. With a fiber of purest glass it would be possible to transmit light signals over 100 kilometers, compared to only 20 meters for the fibers available in the 1960s.
In 1969 Willard S. Boyle and George E. Smith invented the first successful imaging technology using a digital sensor, a Charge-Coupled Device. Digital photography has become an irreplaceable tool in many fields of research. The CCD has provided new possibilities to visualize the previously unseen. It has given us crystal clear images of distant places in our universe as well as the depths of the oceans.
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Loop Quantum Gravity
I attended a lecture today by Professor Abhay Ashtekar (of the Institute for Gravitation at Penn State University) about Loop Quantum Gravity at Georgia Tech. Apparently recent work has made considerable progress towards solving the infrared problem (i.e., proving agreement of LQG with classical General Relativity at low densities). Also, a density cutoff (of approximately 41% of the Planck density) has appeared naturally out of the formalism, instead of being imposed arbitrarily as an additional condition.
Slides covering material very similar to his Georgia Tech lecture can be found at
http://universe2009.obspm.fr/fichiers/Recherche/Friday-3/ashtekar.pdf
Possible ramifications of this work:
1) Help resolve the well-known horizon problem
2) Provide a mechanism for propagation of "seeds" for creating structure in the universe
3) Predicts a period of super-inflation, which could have implications for gravitational waves
4) Cause quantum corrections to the cosmic microwave backround radiation
#3 and #4 might provide testable predictions unlike superstring theory
Slides covering material very similar to his Georgia Tech lecture can be found at
http://universe2009.obspm.fr/fichiers/Recherche/Friday-3/ashtekar.pdf
Possible ramifications of this work:
1) Help resolve the well-known horizon problem
2) Provide a mechanism for propagation of "seeds" for creating structure in the universe
3) Predicts a period of super-inflation, which could have implications for gravitational waves
4) Cause quantum corrections to the cosmic microwave backround radiation
#3 and #4 might provide testable predictions unlike superstring theory
Saturday, August 01, 2009
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Monday, December 15, 2008
Thursday, December 11, 2008
Baez's Classical Mechanics Website
As long as I'm posting these Goldstein solutions, I should definitely point out one of the best classical mechanics websites out there.
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/classical/
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/classical/
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Tuesday, October 07, 2008
2008 Nobel Prize in Physics
Yoichiro Nambu, who discovered the mechanism of spontaneous symmetry breaking, and Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa, who discovered the origin of the broken symmetry that predicts the existence of at least three families of quarks in nature, are announced as winners of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physics.
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)